Photo by Dave Garcia on Pexels
A journalist, a gym, and the 1980s body
By the mid-1980s, John Travolta was searching for a role that would re-establish him as a contemporary leading man, and Perfect (1985), directed by James Bridges, who had directed him in Urban Cowboy, seemed to offer one. Travolta played Adam Lawrence, a Rolling Stone journalist assigned to write an exposé about Los Angeles health clubs and the fitness culture that had become a national obsession. In the course of his reporting, Adam falls for Jessie, a fitness instructor played by Jamie Lee Curtis, and must choose between his story and his relationship. The film was intended as a serious drama about journalism, ethics and the body in 1980s America. On release it was a critical and commercial failure, and it is now best remembered for its aerobics sequences and its soundtrack, but it remains an instructive chapter in Travolta’s career: a film that tried to be about something real and was overwhelmed by the very culture it sought to examine.
Adam Lawrence is a successful magazine writer, a man who has built a career on exposing fads and phonies. His editor sends him to Los Angeles to investigate health clubs, which Adam initially dismisses as temples of narcissism. At a club called The Sports Connection, he meets Jessie, an instructor whose classes are hugely popular and who is wary of journalists, having been burned by publicity before. Adam, using a false pretext, joins her class, interviews her students, and begins a relationship with her, all while planning a story that will portray the fitness world as shallow and self-obsessed. The ethical conflict is clear, and Travolta plays Adam’s growing discomfort with his own deception as the film’s central drama.
The fitness boom as a subject
The mid-1980s fitness boom was a genuine cultural phenomenon. Aerobics classes, popularised by Jane Fonda’s workout videos, drew millions of participants, mostly women, and health clubs became social centres as well as places to exercise. Perfect tried to take that phenomenon seriously, filming long aerobics sequences with real instructors and participants, and using the gym as a setting for questions about vanity, health, community and self-improvement. Bridges, who had brought a documentary eye to the honky-tonk in Urban Cowboy, brought a similar eye to the gym: the mirrored walls, the pounding music, the synchronised movement, the sweat and the camaraderie are all filmed with attention to detail.
Travolta and Curtis both trained extensively for their roles, and their physical commitment is evident. Curtis, in particular, is impressive as Jessie, leading classes with authority and charisma, and her performance gives the film an energy that its script often lacks. Travolta, as Adam, is less at home in the gym than Jessie is, and that discomfort is partly intentional: Adam is an outsider, a writer observing a world he does not belong to. But the film never quite decides whether Adam’s outsider status is a strength, giving him critical distance, or a weakness, making him a hypocrite who exploits the people he claims to expose. Travolta plays the ambiguity with sincerity, but the script does not give him enough to resolve it, and the romance, which should anchor the film, feels underdeveloped.
Journalism and ethics
The film’s most interesting idea is its treatment of journalism. Adam is not a villain; he is a professional doing his job, and his editor, played by Anne de Salvo, pressures him to deliver a sensational story. His dilemma — whether to betray Jessie’s trust for a career-making article — is a real one, and it echoes the dilemmas of other 1980s films about the press. Bridges, who had explored institutional power in The China Syndrome, clearly wanted Perfect to be a film about how stories are made, how sources are used, and how the line between reporting and exploitation can blur. In practice, however, the film spends so much time on aerobics montages and on the physical spectacle of the gym that the ethical drama gets lost.
Critics on release were harsh, focusing on the film’s glossy surface, its thin characterisation, and its failure to live up to its serious intentions. Audiences stayed away, and Perfect became one of the notable flops of 1985, a year that also saw disappointments for several other major stars. The soundtrack, featuring songs by Wham!, Jermaine Jackson and others, sold moderately, but it could not save the film. For Travolta, Perfect was another setback in a period that was already difficult, following Two of a Kind and preceding a series of smaller films that would keep him working but not restore his box-office standing.
Bridges and Travolta, second time around
James Bridges had directed Travolta to success in Urban Cowboy, and their reunion on Perfect was expected to repeat that success. Both men were interested in contemporary American subcultures — the honky-tonk, the health club — and in working-class and middle-class characters trying to make sense of changing times. Urban Cowboy had succeeded because its subculture was specific, its characters were vivid, and its story was rooted in a marriage. Perfect struggled because its subculture, while visually striking, was less dramatically rich, and because its central relationship never achieves the lived-in quality of Bud and Sissy’s. The comparison is instructive: it shows how much a film depends not on its subject but on its characters, and how even talented collaborators can miss when the script does not give them enough to work with.
Travolta’s performance, viewed today, is better than the film’s reputation suggests. He is relaxed, funny in places, and genuinely conflicted in the scenes where Adam must decide what kind of journalist — and what kind of man — he wants to be. He also shares a credible chemistry with Curtis, whose Jessie is the film’s most fully realised character. Their scenes together, whether arguing about the story, dancing at a club, or simply talking after class, have a warmth that suggests the better film Perfect might have been. That warmth is a reminder of Travolta’s greatest strength as a romantic leading man: he makes the audience believe that his characters care, even when the plot around them does not quite earn that belief.
Why Adam Lawrence matters
Adam Lawrence matters in Travolta’s filmography because he represents the actor trying to grow up in public. The teen idol of Grease and the disco king of Saturday Night Fever were, by 1985, in their thirties, and Travolta was looking for roles that reflected adult concerns: work, ethics, relationships, the body as it ages and changes. Perfect was a flawed attempt at that transition, but it was an attempt, and it shows Travolta refusing to simply repeat his hits. He chose a director he trusted, a contemporary subject, and a role that required him to be thoughtful rather than merely charming.
Watch Perfect today and it works best as a time capsule: of leotards and leg warmers, of mirrored gyms and pounding aerobics music, of a moment when fitness became a moral as well as a physical ideal. It also works as a reminder that even unsuccessful films can reveal an actor’s intentions. Travolta wanted to be taken seriously as an adult leading man, and Perfect, for all its faults, shows him trying. The comeback that would eventually arrive, in the 1990s, would be built on that same seriousness, combined with the charm and physical presence that had made him a star in the first place.